Plurk vs. Twitter...what's the diff?
Recently, a friend asked me to share my experience with Plurk saying that he needed some guidance through it. While not being a "plurkanista" just yet, I do spend my fair share of time there and, thus, am happy to comply with my friend's request.
First, this screenshot from Plurk's home page...
Note the line, "Tired of your existing Social Networks?" While I don't know if that's a direct shot across Twitter's bow, they hit the nail squarely on the head. (Sorry for mixed metaphors.)
It seems to me Plurk is positioning itself as the fresh alternative to Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and the like. After all, we've been there, done that, right? The shine has worn off, and like kids in a toy store, we're on to the next, newest thing to scratch our social media itch. (More on that in a minute.)
Back to the Twitter vs. Plurk comparison...
One reason people are moving over to Plurk is they've grown weary of Twitter's instability. "Enough with the @#$%! 'fail whale' already," we shout at the monitor. In that respect, Twitter's loss is Plurk's gain.
Aside from that, Twitter falls short in one key area that Plurk has made its sweet spot: The ability to carry on a threaded conversation.
Twitter has been defined, among other things, as a "high latency instant messaging system." In some ways that's just fine. For those who want to use the app to carry on a conversation though, "high latency" is a drawback. And it's that part that Plurk addresses.
Plurk is a communal instant messaging system. Think Yahoo! IM or Skype + Twitter and you've got it. Where Twitter is great for broadcast messaging, Plurk is all about developing a network of friends.
Whether the conversation is as mundane as what someone had for breakfast, as significant as passing along a business lead or referral or even carrying on a virtual workshop, Plurk enables conversation at a much more rapid-fire pace than Twitter ever could.
(Keep in mind, Twitter was never designed for that purpose. It's members refitted it with the use of the "@" symbol. Twitter was kind enough to accommodate that behavior, but it still wasn't the reason the application was built.)
There are other key differences too. Plurk has done a 180 on Twitter's "plain jane, just the facts ma'am" interface and developed a fancy, somewhat playful, "artsy" design that incorporates little "creatures."
Cute, huh? But it's part of Plurk's kitschy charm.
Not only that, but Plurk presents all conversation threads as part of a time line.
I liken it to a conversation "river" into which each participant steps. A conversation or thought "stream" if you would. (BTW, in each of these examples I've blotted out the names of the "Plurkers," as they're called.)
Here are a couple of screenshots showing more detail.
My "Plurk"...
Followed by the conversation thread...
It's really a lot of fun and very addictive. Occasionally, it's even productive too! :-)
Remember what I said about "new toy" earlier? I don't mean to minimize the value proposition of any of these various and sundry social media applications. There is value to be had. I'm referring to the fact that many, like me, tend to be early adopters at best and fickle at worst in our use of them.
What's with the "Karma" thing?
Plurk uses a points system it has dubbed as "karma," to encourage usage. The more plurks you post, conversations you engage in or friends you invite, the more points you get. While this appeals to some people, most I've talked to pay little attention to it. (Unless Plurk takes away points for lack of participation. Then, we pay it some mind. Otherwise, not so much.)
As your points increase, you get more bells and whistles, such as more smiley face icons for example as well as the ability to customize your profile.
Personally, not being into eastern mysticism or religious thought, I'm not a big fan of the term. (How about "grace" as an alternative? Now, that, I can get into.)
Creating cliques
Neither am I a fan of another term Plurk uses, "cliques." Plurk uses the term to mean "groups;" in that you can create groups of plurkers which you can message collectively.
I've never been a fan of cliques, mostly because I never was part of one. To me, they carry a negative stigma. While I like the functionality, I don't care for the terminology.
Private messaging
Even though Plurk is communal, you can choose to send messages to one or a few plurkers via a private channel only they can see.
Friends...fans
Like any other social network application, Plurk allows you to "friend" others. However, it takes things a step further by allowing you to become fans of others as well. I love the notification message, "so and so is now a fan of you." Makes me feel like a rock star...but only for a moment. Heh.
Conclusion
If you happen to be one who likes chatting with others online, then Plurk is made in the shade for you.
BTW, I asked some plurkers want they felt was the differentiating factor and/or Plurk's value proposition and several were kind enough to respond. (Did I mention each plurk is it's on little HTML file?) You're welcome to add your two cents (or three...or four...etc) to the conversation, either to that thread or by leaving a comment here.
Oh, and if you'd like to friend me, I'm @pchaney. (Yes, Plurk uses the "@" symbol too.) Fan me too. That's even better. I love that momentary rock star feeling you know.
Finally, tomorrow I'm going to talk about a recent development in Plurk user behavior, something called Plurkshops.
While Twitter is the IM writ large, Plurk hits the segment of micro-forum with the threaded conversations. I'm not sure one system is better than the other, but they have different uses, and ideal users, at different times.
For many people, the hodge podge of the chat room is exhilarating, and Twitter fills that role very well, despite too many cameo appearances from the fail whale. On the other hand, other people will prefer the more threaded approach of the forum and message board found on Plurk. Keep in mind that as Plurk adds more users, their version of the fail whale may start to appear as their system limits get tested.
I see value to both systems, and each has unique values that work for different market segments. Innovation is a very good thing, and new social media are always welcome if they serve a market segment that is under represented.
Posted by: Wayne Hurlbert | July 20, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Good Post, Paul. It will be helpful to those entering social networking.
Posted by: Lewis Green | July 20, 2008 at 03:23 PM
I find Twitter (sans Fail Whale) to be more "instant" and good for surface-scanning. Plurk takes more time, but is good for the conversation threads; that part is excellent.
The items that annoys me is the "karma" and Cliques as well. Agree with you there! I spend enough time on these mediums I don't need to be fiddling with my karma online as well...
If I want to get something across Twitter, Plurk, identi.ca etc., then I use Ping.fm a handy instant broadcast tool. Good topic!
Posted by: Webconomist | July 20, 2008 at 03:29 PM
I have both twitter, plurk, and multiple other profiles on social networks and micro-blogs. In my opinion it comes down to a couple of things: What is convenient, where your friends are, where the people you trust/like/associate with/ or other business professional enjoy the most, how you can get your message across the best and just which you are loyal to. Frankly for me it comes down to this: I like twitter, my friends are on both (but we all PREFER twitter), everything you complain about twitter for is being fixed/updated/or has fan apis that make Twitter far superior to Plurk. Now if we look at this from a completely different standpoint both are a minority compared to some international micro-blogs with a much larger user-base. Twitter is occasionally slow yes, but that should be done in a few months. As for Plurk being easier to follow--that again is a matter of opinion and not fact. I applaud Plurk for some originality and for appealing to teens with their kharma game aspect, or adults who like to be told they are popular, and while it is fun to see what else they will give you for higher levels I don't think it is a determining factor on functionality and why to choose that over another service.
Not to break down this post, it had a few good points on why you enjoy their services. Just playing devil's advocate and placing the other side of the story out there. If anyone does want more information on all of the possible services and fan apis for twitter I have written multiple posts on my blog, otherwise twitter has their own blog that overlays the newest services.
Posted by: Desarae | July 20, 2008 at 11:32 PM
Desarae, no doubt Twitter's API gives it advantages at this point. However, Plurk will have their own API soon too which I suspect will vault its popularity.
A few months is a long time to be patient.
Ultimately, I like them both. Just trying to explain that I think Plurk's popularity is a direct result of Twitter's instability and inefficient way in which it facilitates conversations.
Twitter is designed to serve one purpose and Plurk another.
Posted by: Paul Chaney | July 21, 2008 at 12:27 AM