How to pitch bloggers...the need for best practices and standards
Mack Collier's post at MarketingProfs, Dueling Blacklists: Bloggers vs. PR Firms, has raised quite a stir.
The post addresses the issue of PR folks pitching bloggers and the animus that can come as a result of irrelevant, unsolicited pitches. Specifically, Mack cites Lifehacker editor Gina Trapani's threat to blacklist PR firms which engage in this practice.
You'd think Mack released a fox into the hen house. One has only to look at the comments section to watch the feathers fly.
As you can see, I had to weigh in with a comment of my own.
More to the point, you'd think by now that we would have reached some degree of understanding about how pitching to bloggers should be done -- as if we're a special class that needs its own set of rules. ("Elitist" is the term I used in my comment.)
PR pros and bloggers have been writing about this issue for years.
Veteran PR blogger BL Ochman addressed the issue in July of 2004 in a post entitled, The PR Lessons of a Clueless Blog Pitch (BL has a way with words doesn't she?) in which she outlined several suggestions:
- Address the blogger by his/her name, or just say "hi." Never say "dear editor" or "dear sir/madam" (honest, I get pitches addressed that way.)
- Don't tell anyone they "must" or "should" write a story or book a guest. Instead, explain why the topic is of interest and why this person an expert worth knowing. Don't be cute.
- Reporters and bloggers all follow headlines. Explain how the idea or person you are pitching ties into a current news item or a trend.
- Let the blogger know you've at least looked at the publication and see if you can find something to praise. For God's sake though, don't say "Loved your great post the other day" unless you read it and you mean it. People who look at dozens of releases and pitches a day can pick up on baloney faster than a hungry hound.
- Don't whine if you don't get coverage by saying you "can't believe" the blogger didn’t include, won't write about, haven't heard of XYZ company.
- Bloggers aim to provide a personal view of the news. They write in conversational style as an antidote to the canned news of traditional media. Why would you send a canned PR-speak pitch?
- Run your content through Bullfighter or similar software to be sure it is bullshit and jargon-free before you send it out.
Add to that a 2006 post by Top Rank Marketing blogger Lee Odden in which he rendered a set of guidelines that I think are worth repeating. Succinctly stated, they are:
- Be relevant
- Personalize
- Make it easy
- Swag is good
- Be persistent
Most recently (like, two days ago), Matt Haughey, writing directly in response to Trapani's blacklist made the following suggestions:
- Don’t ever send a press release to a blogger based on a purchased list
- Go beyond the press release
- Introduce a feedback loop
- Provide an unsubscribe link
- Use metrics to help you do your PR job
And no one writes more well-reasoned, expertly opinioned commentary than PR blogger Brian Solis. He weighs in on the issue here .
(I hope you'll take time to review each of the above referenced posts to get the full force of their argument.)
Add to these a couple of great resources:
- Art and Science of Blogger Relations - Free ebook from Brian Solis (PDF)
- Shift Communications blogger relations tipsheet (PDF)
Let's convene a summit
Even with all that, we have yet to reach concensus on how to pitch bloggers. Therefore, I want to make the following recommendation as a way to remedy the problem that so obviously still exists: Convene a summit.
MarketingProfs would be the perfect organization to serve as host. A panel of experts representing both sides of the issue would be charged with determining a set of guidelines.
(Of course, let's not overlook the need for grassroots participation. Any interested party should have the right to weigh in. Maybe an acceptable set of standards could even be devised via the means of crowdsourced co-creation.)
Regardless of the method(s) employed, it seems to me a set of best practices/guidelines/standards (whatever you want to call them) in how to pitch bloggers needs to be created -- standards which everyone in the industry agrees to abide.
I know, that's a long shot. Probably won't happen. But, considering the brouhaha that developed as a result of Mack's post, it certainly needs to... for it's still a touchy subject to be sure.
PS: I need to admit that I rarely, if ever, get pitched by PR folk. Hence, my frustration level is yet untapped. If I were getting hundreds per week, I might feel more rancor over the matter. Nonetheless, my previous point stands.
Paul I think you hit on a key point here, notice that the bloggers getting upset are mainly the ones that have well-trafficked blogs and likely get dozens if not hundreds of bad pitches every day. It's one thing for those of us getting a handful or fewer a day/week to say it's not a big deal, but when you're working 16+ hours a day and spending a couple of them wading through crappy pitches, I can see how those people would get upset.
And I could also see how PR bloggers would adopt the 'you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater' mentality, and get their feathers ruffled.
I'm not sure what the answer is. Blogger can no doubt think that PR firms need them more, and PR firms no doubt think that they can send mass email/press releases to hundreds of blogs, hoping a few will bite. In a way it's like both sides are operating from the POV that they really don't respect the time of the other.
And I think that's the problem. How do we solve it? Well I'm not sure, but I do know that dueling blacklists aren't going to get us closer to a solution.
Posted by: Mack Collier | May 13, 2008 at 05:47 PM
Mack, all the more reason to hold some type of summit (whether online or in-person) to discuss this issue matter-of-factly.
Obviously, if as you suggest in your post, that the problem is no better now than it was 3 years ago, it's time to take some remedial action.
MarketingProfs is in a position to pull something together and I would like to throw down the gauntlet in that regard. If nothing else, perhaps a task force consisting of bloggers/pr people charged with the responsibility of bringing something of consequence to the table.
A perennial problem exists. Let's find a way to solve it.
Posted by: Paul Chaney | May 13, 2008 at 06:21 PM
Educational efforts, a summit certainly fits this mode, to bring people up to speed is a good idea. Anyone wanting to be engaged in blogger relations is just going to have to do the work of getting to know them, maybe one at a time. There are no short cuts.
Posted by: Mike Chapman | May 14, 2008 at 12:03 AM
Another major thing that the PR firms seem to overlook is that if they keep persisting in this fashion, the bloggers will no longer take ANY requests. Imagine you as a blogger not only get a ton of horrible pitches, but you get them from the same firm. And then say you ARE one of the bloggers with a high readership.... soon you'll want to have nothing to do with any PR firm, even the ones that may pitch well. And as a PR firm, you don't want your reputation to be tarnished because you're known for horrible pitches. I'll not reiterate the comments already here, but it seems like these PR firms just plain aren't thinking and don't realize the potential and influence of the blogsphere. They might start to take after some of the sports teams that are letting bloggers (limited number, of course, but still....) into their press boxes after a game.
Posted by: Kate Brodock | May 15, 2008 at 09:55 PM
Paul I'm responding directly to this:
Most recently (like, two days ago), Matt Haughey, writing directly in response to Trapani's blacklist made the following suggestions:
Don’t ever send a press release to a blogger based on a purchased list
Go beyond the press release
Introduce a feedback loop
Provide an unsubscribe link
Use metrics to help you do your PR job
"Provide and Unsubscribe link" that runs counter to sending a press release to a list. So I would clarify this by saying you should include a line about not wanting to receive any information on this topic, or apologies if I misinterpreted your blog writing, if you are not interested in this topic please let me know.
Unsubscribe is by definition mass mailing.
make sense?
Posted by: Albert Maruggi | May 23, 2008 at 09:20 AM