« November 2008 | Main | January 2009 »

December 2008

December 31, 2008

Five years at business blogging and counting

Birthday-candle

Yesterday, I read that December marks five years that Top Rank Marketing's Lee Odden has been at the business of blogging. (Congrats Lee!)

That post jogged my memory and caused me to realize that this month marks my fifth year as well. I started in December 2003 using a Typepad blog for the Internet marketing consultancy I owned at the time, Radiant Marketing Group.

Blogging has not only been a game-changer for me, but a life-changer as well. It's led to a career in Internet marketing, blog and social media consulting, a book (and another to be published in 2009) and the opportunity to serve as president of IBNMA.

More importantly, it's led to the development of a network of friends and connections that literally spans the globe. For a country boy who grew up at Rural Route 1, Hickory, Mississippi, that ain't too bad. Not bad at all.

Unlike Lee and many other veteran bloggers from the class of 2003 and 2004, my blogging path has been a bit eclectic (shall we say even "schizophrenic") While Lee, Toby Bloomberg, Yvonne DiVita, Denise Wakeman, Wayne Hurlbert and many others have "plowed the same field" on one blog for years, I've had the privilege to ply my trade at quite a number:

IOWs, just about everyone but b5media. Like I said, a bit schizo! :-) (Chalk it up to a short attention span.)

If I had more time today, I'd create a list of favorite posts, events, etc. Unfortunately, my day job won't allow and, besides, we're about to close shop for the day and my wife and I are headed to celebrate the holiday with relatives.

To my fellow veteran business bloggers who have persevered over the years, here's to you. May blogging be very good to us in 2009 and bring us all continued business and personal success.

December 30, 2008

On the web, Authority has always been about popularity

I was apprised of the latest episode of "As the Web Turns" today by my boss who , "I can't believe you're not weighing in on this."  

I'm referring to yet another version of the same drama that's been playing for years regarding the question of what defines authority on the Web, this time as it pertains to Twitter. It involves some veteran actors too - Robert Scoble, Mike Arrington and Loic LeMeur - Silicon Valley insiders who, because they live in a bubble, tend to get worked up over things the rest of the world doesn't or shouldn't.

Loic, founder of Seesmic, posted a request that Twitter add a new feature, search by authority, which he (rather innocently if you ask me) suggested equated to the number of followers one has. The more followers, the greater the authority. Arrington chimed in saying the idea made sense. Scoble, who has dealt with this issue in the past in regard to Technorati's version of authority, countered by saying the idea is "patently idiotic." (I'm with Scoble on this one.)

Before we go any further please understand my purpose in this post is not to jump into the frey in hopes of obtaining mention on TechMeme (probably too late for that anyway). I could care less about this "bitchmeme," as one blogger referred to it. My desire is to add some historic perspective and say that, as it pertains to the Web, authority has always been associated with popularity.

Google PageRank

Take , for example, Google's term for its link analysis algorhitm used in determining how Web pages are returned in search results. One means by which this determination is made is the number of links one page receives from others. 

In other words, PageRank is like a "ballot box" and the more votes one site gets from others, the more "authority" it has. I know it's not merely a matter of the number of votes and that other factors are involved. However, the number of links is foundational to the way the system works.

Sound like a popularity contest? It does to me. 

Technorati Authority

Technorati defiines authority as "the number of blogs linking to a website in the last six months. The higher the number, the more Technorati Authority the blog has." Again, a popularity contest. 

Steve Rubel weighed in on this nearly three years ago and what he said about Technorati then has bearing on the argument today.  

"So, I am going to argue that links - be they Google or Technorati - have turned the entire concept of authority into something rather trivial - popularity," said Steve. "Does this mean Britney Spears is an authority too just because she's popular?"

Replace the term "links" with "followers" and you see it's the same argument all over again. BTW, , and I echo Steve's question, does this make her an authority? If so, about what? 

Taking Britney into consideration, another way of looking at this is authority = celebrity (or vice-versa), and that's decidedly not how it should be defined.

How Authority Should Be Defined

"Authority" on the Web should be defined no differently than the dictionary does: 

1. "An individual cited or appealed to as an expert" is one way Merriam-Webster puts it. In no way does that suggest a correlation to popularity. I know many experts in social media marketing, for example, who do not have large followings on Twitter. They are authoritative nonetheless.

2. "Power to influence or command thought, opinion, or behavior." It is conceivable to equate "influence" with popularity in this case. After all, one could argue if they weren't influential they wouldn't have large followings. So, score one for the authority = popularity crowd. Yet, like Steve said in his post, it seems strange to me. 

Loic mended the error of his ways in a later post by saying, "the number of followers is in no way a measure of authority" and indicated his use of the term was a faux pas

Still, he got his wish. Merely 12 hours after making that request, a developer named John Wheatley created an app called, are you ready for this, Twitority. And it does precisely what Loic asked for, returns authority-based Twitter searches. (UPDATE: I just found out there was yet another Twitter authority search engine already in existance, Twithority. Not sure why the need for two, but, oh well.)

Should popularity be the barometer for what constitutes authority? I think not. How about you?

Related Posts:

December 23, 2008

Social media marketing predictions for 2009

If you've yet to read Joe Pulizzi's you should because it contains some eye-opening predictions from leading marketing professionals.

While, as you might expect, there is a wide range and divergence of opinion, some themes emerge.

  1. Advertising will gradually be replaced by information.
  2. Content and conversational marketing strategies will converge.
  3. Social media marketing will continue to gain acceptance

Let's take these one at a time.

Continue reading "Social media marketing predictions for 2009" »

If I were a restaurant, I'd use Twitter to...

Recently, a co-worker's husband opened a new franchise restaurant and she asked me about ways to use social media to help build awareness. Literally, the first thought that came to mind was to go to Twitter and crowdsource the answer. So I did, asking fellow twits to finish this sentence, "If I were a restaurant, I would use Twitter to...."

Continue reading "If I were a restaurant, I'd use Twitter to..." »

December 22, 2008

Early Christmas presents from Trulia, Top Rank Marketing and Blog Squad

"Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus," said Francis Church, and I know of at least two of his elves: Frances Flynn Thorsen, Community Manager at Trulia, Lee Odden, CEO of Top Rank Online Marketing.and the Blog Squad's .

Fran surprised me (pleasantly) by inclusion as one of the Top Ten Real Estate Speakers of 2009 which, considering that I'm not a Realtor, is a pretty phenomenal thing if you think about it. I join the likes of Bernice Ross, Ilyce Glink and Jeff Turner. It's an esteemed group to be sure.

Here is Fran's rationale...

Paul Chaney is a social media and blog evangelist with all the vim and vigor of the Baptist preacher that is Paul in another life. Paul is the founder of International Blogging and New Media Assn. Co-author of Realty Blogging, the first book about real estate blogging, Paul is a favorite among the Kool-Aid drinkers in real estate – diehard bloggers and social media geeks. He preaches to the choir … and it’s the masses of unconnected real estate professionals who need to hear his message.

A second present, one received by not only myself, but Bizzuka CEO John Munsell, is inclusion by Top Rank Marketing's Lee Odden on a list called Best Podcasts on Social Media for Bizzuka's User Friendly Thinking Radio show which airs every Friday at noon central on Blog Talk Radio. (BTW, though I'd never come right out and ask you to do it, there is the option to vote for your favorite, uh-hum.)

Last but not least, Denise nominated me for a Shorty Award. (And I think she meant the one for micro-content, not actual height. Considering I'm only 5'8" and that's on a good day, I suppose it's reasonable to think she could have meant it either way. :->)

Though there's a good likelyhood I'll see coal in my stocking come Christmas morning, these are serendipities I didn't expect. On that other hand, maybe I've been better this year than I thought. If that's not the case, don't tell Fran, Lee or Denise please.

Social media is a tool and a mindset

A recent post by my good friend *John Jantsch asserts that "social media is a tool, it's not a religion, there are no real rules and we are experimenting every day."

While I tend to be zealous about the use of social media for marketing purposes and very evangelistic its promotion, I do agree with John that social media is a toolset. Where I do find myself at variance with his assertion is when he says these are "just" tools.

As with any tool, those associated with social media must be used in accordance with their design. You don't use a hammer to screw in a bolt and you don't use a saw to drive a nail.  Similarily, there are certain "rules" that govern social media engagement and John hits the nail on the head (pardon the pun) with this declaration: Don't be rude. Don't be boring. Give to get. 

However, there is a fallacy and even subtle danger in suggesting, especially to those either uninitiated or newly initiated in social media, that it's just tools. There is more to it than that. 

Social media is also a mindset. 

I have to go back to the "bible" of social media, the Cluetrain Manifesto, and reference the very first of the 95 Theses - "Markets are conversations." 

What I'm seeing, especially with Twitter, are some disturbing trends: 
  • Automation - This includes autoreplies and scheduled posts. 
  • Old-school, direct marketing-oriented "pitching."
The worst of the worst is when those two trends are combined. The auto-response subverts the need for real human interaction and the upfront pitch subverts any need to build real, human relationships (to whatever degree that's possible in Twitter). 

Both fly in the face of what social media is all about and I'm grieved that the most conversational and human of all social media tools, Twitter, is being turned into nothing more than a marketing machine. (Same with Facebook too, for that matter.)

I like what blogger David Risley had to say on this matter in a post from a few months back...

"There will always be some who will flock to a new social media site in order to game it for cash. They see it as a huge pool of eyeballs that need to be driven to their website. And, of course, Twitter is a good medium for that. But, it has to be used PROPERLY and with social tact. You need to be a good community member first, and marketer second."

I don't mean to be unreasonable or over-reactive. It's just that bad things happen to good technology when marketing people get involved. Look at the evolution of blogs over the years. What was once referred to as the "last form of honest advertising" is now an untrusted medium, according to Forrester. 

A medium built on the stalwarts of "authenticity" and "transparency" has de-evolved to something that is, at times, farcical (see here and here) thanks to marketers. Now, something similar is happening with Twitter.

I'm not suggesting that, other than Twammers, people have surrepticious motives. Rather, they are either misinformed or ignorant of social media mores and folkways. They just don't know any better (And, if they do, then shame on them.) and it is incumbant upon us "kool-aid" drinkers to help them get it. 

Call me a purist if you wish, the fact is, old-school marketing doesn't work in social media. Dare I say it again, "markets are conversations" and "participation is marketing." If you're unwilling to adopt that mindset you have no business trying to ply your wares using these tools. 

I'm not opposed to experimenting with the medium. However, I am unwilling to prostitute it simply to generate a more favorable ROI. 

(One suggestion: If we're going to experiment, let's find a way to do so in a more controlled environment than in the full-on entirety of the blog or social media spheres.)

Bottom line:  Social media is tools, but  not "just" tools. It's also a mindset. If you're going to use the tools, do so in the way the way they were designed and intended to be used. 

*=Just to be clear, I have the utmost respect and appreciation for John and his point of view. He was a recent guest on Bizzuka's User Friendly Thinking radio show and we enjoyed a great conversation. He is a man who has the utmost integrity, honesty and authenticity. He is my friend and has been for years. I have learned a great, great deal from him and am deeply appreciative of all that he has taught.

December 15, 2008

Creating a new brand, User Friendly Thinking

HdrLogo

At "Bizzuka Labs," we're creating a new social media marketing brand called User Friendly Thinking. While still in the process of clarifying the brand message, essentially it's a place where "technology and creativity intersect."

We refer to User Friendly Thinking as a "social media" brand, mainly because that's the channel through which it's being deployed.

Currently we offer:

UserFriendlyThinking.com
We're "eating our own dogfood" and have built a multi-blog, multi-author site using our own blog component, which is part of our overall CMS. While it's a work in progress, and certainly not on par with WordPress, Movable Type or WordFrame, we're rather proud of it. For the time being, contributors are members of the Bizzuka staff. We plan to invite outside contributors in the not-too-distant future.

User Friendly Thinking Radio
Every Friday at noon central we interview social media movers-and-shakers. Past guests have included Jason Falls, Ben McConnell, Anita Campbell, Charlene Li, Mack Collier, Toby Bloomberg as well as an assortment of Web designers, developers and our own staff.  The show is beginning to catch on too. Last week's episode with Mack was one In the near future our guest will include Wayne Hurlbert, John Jantsch and Michelle Miller among others.


This was a group started by our SVP of Global Sales and Business Development, Charles Lauller. Currently, it numbers some 167 members and growing everyday. We are getting our share of spammers though and figuring out ways to deal with it. We'd like to invite you to join if you're interested.

Plans for the future include a Twitter handle, video channel, Facebook group and online community.

The endgame here is to use UFT as a social media and content marketing "magnet" to introduce Bizzuka to a wider audience, but do so by focusing on the topics of Web design, development, content management and marketing rather than on Bizzuka itself.

As you can see from the UFT site, references to Bizzuka are minimal and non-invasive. We plan to keep it that way. It's "marketing by participation" that will drive the brand, not "hey, over here, look at us!!!!" forms of interruption.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this idea along with any advice you'd care to share. It's an experiment and we can use all the input we can get. Do you think we're on the right track? What suggestions would you have for future development?

December 11, 2008

Connecting Google Friend Connect and Typepad Connect

I've created an online community on this blog called Friends of CMM (which I invite you to join btw), which includes a couple of widgets from Google , the new service that enables any Web site to have a social component.

I've also deployed SixApart's new social component, Typepad Connect, which is a mashup of threaded Gravatar-style comments, Typepad Profiles and their anti-spam application. Interestingly, the app is available for use on a number of blog platforms, including WordPress and Blogger.

The ability to incorporate these and other open-source applications further reinforces the point that blogs can serve as a social media base of operations from which users can foray into other socnets like Facebook and Twitter.

Like Google says, these apps mean "more people engaging more deeply with your website -- and with each other."

December 10, 2008

Wikily working

Lately, I've been giving more attention to the use of wikis for networking collaboratively, having started three, including the What's Working in Social Media one I mentioned yesterday. The other two are private, one related to something we're doing at Bizzuka, and one for a group I've been invited to be part of.

Part of the reason I'm doing this is for research on my upcoming book on social media marketing, but mostly its because I want to embrace the power of social networking in its most collaborative form to date, a wiki. A number of do-it-yourself wiki platforms are available, but I favor WetPaint for its ease of use.

I read an excerpt from Clay Shirky's new book Here Comes Everybody that said, "We are living in the middle of a remarkable increase in our ability to share, to cooperate with one another, and to take collective action. These changes will transform the world everywhere groups of people come together to accomplish something."

Thanks to tools like wikis, the technological barriers to co-creation, collaboration and change have largely been eliminated. The one barrier that remains is human being's willingness to actively engage. The 90-9-1 rule still seems to be in effect and our reluctance to participate has to be overcome. Otherwise, the influence remains in the hands of a relative few.

A great resource for better understanding the power of wikis to foster social change is a PDF entitled Working Wikily: How Networks are Changing Social Change, written by the Monitor Institute. They've also created a blog by the same name.

Once again, let me invite you to join in participating on the What's Working wiki. The only way that site will have any real value is by virtue of the contributions of its members.

Hat tip to Connectedness

December 09, 2008

What's working in social media wiki

I've started a wiki called What's Working in Social Media to serve as a clearinghouse of information about what companies are doing in terms of their use of social media for marketing, customer service and business communications in general.

I'm looking for "real world" case studies, examples, stories and illustrations and welcome your participation.

Like I say on the wiki, "The days of 'touchy-feely, warm-and-fuzzy' thinking about social media marketing is over. The CEO wants to know if it has ROI potential and can positively effect the bottom line. Everyone from real estate agents to CMOs at F1000s are asking, 'Does it work? If so, how?'"

I'm using this as a research tool for my new book on social media marketing. In addition, I'm going to produce an ebook consisting of 101 examples, all of which will be drawn from the wiki (assuming I can get 101 from it). Attribution will of course be given to each contributor.

We currently have, at the time of this post, 60 members and I welcome your participation. Click here to sign up.

»

Site Sponsor

My Photo

My Other Accounts

Ning StumbleUpon

Twitter Updates

    Blog Directory for Lafayette, LA